Login

The decision that did the work

Analysis is the product, not the test

His test for whether a question bank is any good

Nashta before the Prelims

The Mains Mentorship Program, day by day

Why rationales beat re-reading

His three rules, in his own order

Why mocks build critical thinking

What to take from AIR 50

Frequently asked questions

← Back to Blogs

NORCET 11 AIR 50: Arbaz Cleared on His First Attempt

He finished his theory before he finished his degree. That single decision turned the six months after his pass-out into pure revision.

Oct 22, 2026

•

7 min Read

•

By Dr. Prince Kaushik

NORCET 11 AIR 50: Arbaz Cleared on His First Attempt

Quick answer: Arbaz secured All India Rank 50 in NORCET 11 Mains 2026 on his first attempt. He passed out in March 2026 but began preparing in August the previous year, during his college internship. By pass-out his theory was already complete, which turned March to September into six months of pure revision. He is one of 38 NPrep students in the All-India top 100.


The decision that did the work

Most first-attempt stories are about intensity. This one is about a calendar.

Arbaz started in August, while his internship was still running, rather than waiting for the degree to finish. The consequence is the entire story:

DateState of preparation
August 2025Started, during internship
March 2026Passed out — theory already complete
March to September 2026Pure revision, two to four full passes

Compare that to the default path, where preparation begins after the degree and the same six months have to carry first-reading and revision and question practice. Starting eight months early did not mean studying harder. It meant arriving at the final stretch with nothing left to learn for the first time.

He is honest that the internship made it messy. Shift duty meant some days produced very little. His point is that less still counted, as long as it was not zero.

Analysis is the product, not the test

His sharpest claim:

Giving a mock matters less than analysing it.

The arithmetic he gives is concrete. A test took him an hour to ninety minutes. The analysis took another 10 to 20 minutes, and produced 10 or 20 points per test that had to be noted down.

That ratio is the thing to copy. If your analysis time is near zero, you are buying the least valuable part of a test series and discarding the rest.

His test for whether a question bank is any good

This is a genuinely useful filter, and it is more rigorous than most candidates apply.

He noticed that plenty of sources feel tough — hard questions, low scores, a sense of being stretched — without actually matching NORCET's pattern. Difficulty is not the same as relevance.

So his test was: do the previous year questions match the pattern of what I am practising? He says they did, which is why he rated NPrep's material as NORCET-relevant rather than just hard.

Otherwise someone gives it much tougher and we feel good that they gave it tough. But what comes in NORCET is not that tough.

Nashta before the Prelims

He states directly that some questions from the Nashta series he gave before the Prelims were asked directly in the paper.

But his framing around that is careful, and it is the responsible version of a claim that is often overstated:

Not every question will come directly. But the concept will, and the concept is what you pick up during analysis.

The effect he describes is as much psychological as it is about marks. Recognising a question in the hall made attempting the rest easier.

The Mains Mentorship Program, day by day

He got the programme after Prelims, and describes a structure that compresses a subject into a single day:

  • Four to five hours of class per subject per day
  • A workbook solved in full during the session
  • Then a subject test, a mini test and a mock test, all on that same subject

The effect is that a subject studied over months gets revised three times over in one day — taught, worked through, then tested.

He calls the final 15 to 20 days a crucial phase, and specifically credits getting full app access during it.

Sabha at AIR 135 describes the same programme from the other side, and calls it rank boosting.

Why rationales beat re-reading

His argument for why question practice doubles as revision:

Nobody revises everything. But one NPrep question with its rationale comfortably revises a whole topic.

He also specifically valued that answers came with their reference, which is the difference between being told an answer and being shown where it comes from.

His three rules, in his own order

1. Start early. If your basics get cleared during the internship, the post-degree window becomes pure revision time. On the "I have no time" objection, he is unsentimental: nobody has spare time, so the time has to be taken.

2. Consistency is the key. Study less on bad days, but stay in touch continuously. Not one day on, three days off.

3. Solve MCQs from day one. This is where he explicitly breaks with a common strategy:

Some students cover topics, cover half the syllabus, then say now MCQs. In my opinion that strategy did not work for me.

His version: do the questions on the same day as the topic. Bring in full mocks once you are past 50% of the syllabus.

Note the contrast with Sheetal at AIR 119, who warns that daily full-syllabus mocks before the syllabus is covered will only demotivate you. Both are right: topic questions from day one, full mocks only after 50%.

Why mocks build critical thinking

His observation about the Mains paper specifically:

  • Mains does not ask fact-based recall questions. Those belong to Prelims.
  • Roughly 50 to 60% are priority and clinical scenario questions.
  • Those are exactly the kind that mock practice trains, because they require choosing between defensible options rather than retrieving a fact.

What to take from AIR 50

  1. Start during the internship. It is the single highest-leverage decision in this entire story.
  2. Budget 10 to 20 minutes of analysis per test, and expect 10 to 20 notes out of it.
  3. Test your material against PYQs, not against how hard it feels.
  4. Do topic MCQs on the same day as the topic. Do not bank them for later.
  5. Hold full mocks until 50% syllabus, then make them continuous.

Frequently asked questions

What rank did Arbaz get in NORCET 11? All India Rank 50 in NORCET 11 Mains 2026, on his first attempt.

When should you start preparing for NORCET? Arbaz started in August during his college internship and passed out the following March with his theory already complete, which turned the final six months into pure revision. His advice is to start in the first phase rather than after the degree.

Should you finish the syllabus before starting MCQs? No. He explicitly rejects covering half the syllabus before beginning questions, saying it did not work for him. He recommends doing a topic's MCQs on the same day as the topic, and bringing in full mock tests once you are past 50% of the syllabus.

How long should you spend analysing a NORCET mock test? He spent 10 to 20 minutes analysing each test on top of the 60 to 90 minutes taking it, and got 10 to 20 noteworthy points out of every paper.

What kind of questions come in NORCET Mains? He describes Mains as largely not fact-based recall, with roughly 50 to 60% being priority and clinical scenario questions. Fact-based questions belong to the Prelims stage.


Read the full list of NORCET 11 toppers who prepared with NPrep — 1 in 5 NORCET 11 Mains qualifiers came from NPrep: 2,178+ students qualified, 38 of them in the All-India top 100.

About the Author

Dr. Prince Kaushik

Dr. Prince Kaushik

Founder, NPrep

AIIMS Jodhpur | NPrep Founder He combines his medical background with advanced technology to design high-yield preparation frameworks for competitive nursing exams like AIIMS NORCET, RRB & Staff nurse exams.