Comparing the present study finding with existing literature is included in?

IGNOU Post B. SC. Nursing entrance-2019

Nursing Research & Statistics

Easy

Appeared in: IGNOU Post B. SC. Nursing entrance-2019

Explanation

The Discussion section of a research paper is dedicated to interpreting the study's results and explaining their significance.
A critical component of the Discussion is to contextualize the new findings by comparing and contrasting them with results from previous studies in the existing literature.
This comparison helps to establish whether the new findings support, challenge, or expand upon the established knowledge in a particular field.
According to the standard IMRAD (Introduction, Method, Results, and Discussion) format, this interpretive and comparative function is the primary role of the Discussion section.

Option A: The 'Review of the literature' is presented at the beginning of a paper to provide background and justification for the study. It summarizes what was known before the current study was conducted, so it cannot contain a comparison of the new findings.
Option B: The 'Methodology' section describes the 'how' of the study—the research design, participants, and procedures. It does not involve interpreting or comparing the study's results.
Option D: The 'Analysis' section (or the 'Results' section where it's reported) presents the raw findings and statistical outcomes of the study. It reports 'what' was found, but does not interpret the meaning or compare these findings to other studies.

Clinical Relevance

Nursing practice connection: This is primarily an exam-oriented knowledge point with limited direct bedside application, so retain Structure of a Research Paper (IMRAD format) as background academic context rather than a clinical decision trigger.
Understanding the structure of research papers is a fundamental skill for nurses to engage in evidence-based practice (EBP).
Knowing that the Discussion section contains the comparison to existing literature allows a nurse to quickly assess the novelty, validity, and context of a study's findings when deciding if the evidence is applicable to their practice.
This skill enables nurses to critically appraise research and integrate the best available evidence into patient care, rather than relying on outdated or anecdotal information.

How to Approach the Question

First, identify the key task described in the question stem: 'Comparing the present study finding with existing literature'.
Next, recall the standard structure of a scientific or research paper, which is the IMRAD format (Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion).
Consider the purpose of each section in the IMRAD model:
Introduction: Sets the stage and reviews literature to establish a need for the study.
Methods: Explains how the study was performed.
Results: Presents the objective findings and data.

Concept Tested & Keywords

qbqRi-tbbH_nSU6ul2Cnd

E6 NursingResearch Sukhpal Kaur p. 384-386

E6 NursingResearch Polit 11e Part 2 p. 316-318