DSSSB 13 August 2024
Non Nursing Subjects
Medium

According to Madhyayan, which of the following cities was not under the Palan order?

Appeared in: DSSSB 13 August 2024

Explanation

  • Dhar was the capital of the Paramara dynasty, which ruled over the Malwa region in Central India.
  • The Pala Empire was primarily based in the eastern regions of India, specifically Bengal and Bihar.
  • Due to the distinct geographical locations and the fact that they were separate political entities, Dhar was never under the control of the Pala dynasty.

Why Other Options Were Wrong

  • Option A: This location, while not as famous as Dhar, is presumed to be within the geographical sphere of influence of the Pala Empire in Eastern India. It is incorrect because the question asks what was not under Pala rule.
  • Option C: The name itself suggests an association with the 'Palan order' or Pala dynasty, likely representing a town or administrative center within their territory.
  • Option D: Similar to Ganna, this location is considered to be within the historical territories controlled or influenced by the Palas.

Related Visual

Visual explanation — Related Visual
Clinical Relevance
  • Nursing practice connection: This is primarily an exam-oriented knowledge point with limited direct bedside application, so retain Territorial extent of Medieval Indian Dynasties as background academic context rather than a clinical decision trigger.
  • Understanding the geographical boundaries of medieval empires is crucial for tracing the flow of culture, art, religion, and trade across the Indian subcontinent.
  • The distinction between the Palas (patrons of Mahayana Buddhism) and the Paramaras (patrons of Shaivism and Jainism) highlights the diverse regional developments in medieval India.
  • What if? If the question asked which city was a major center of Pala art, the answer would likely be a location in Bengal or Bihar, such as Nalanda or Vikramashila, not Dhar.
How to Approach the Question
  • First, identify the core task: The question asks to find the city that was not part of the Pala (Palan) dynasty's territory. This is an 'exception' or 'negative' question.
  • Next, analyze the options provided: Ganna, Dhar, Palan, Vyasiya.
  • Recall or deduce the historical context of the Pala Empire. They were a major power primarily located in Eastern India (modern-day Bengal and Bihar).
  • Evaluate each option based on this context. Dhar is a historically significant city. Try to recall its primary historical association.
  • Recognize that Dhar was the famous capital of the Paramara dynasty, who ruled the Malwa region in Central India.
  • Conclude that since the Paramaras were a separate and geographically distinct kingdom from the Palas, their capital (Dhar) would not have been under Pala rule. This makes Dhar the correct answer.
Concept Tested & Keywords
  • Concept Tested: Territorial extent of Medieval Indian Dynasties
  • Stem keywords: Madhyayan, Palan order, cities
  • Lead-in keywords: not
  • Negative lead-in flag: This is a negative-lead-in question, asking you to identify the exception.

Question ID

Q_gtHSI1xHE8zIsOawLmHg

Practise the full DSSSB 13 August 2024

Attempt every question from this paper in a timed mock, then review the full solution for each one.

According to Madhyayan, which of the following cities was not under the Palan order? - DSSSB 13 August 2024 | NPrep