HPSSC - 2015
Child Health Nursing (Pediatrics)
Medium

Which of the nurse's actions is not recommended while caring for a newborn of an HIV-positive mother?

Appeared in: HPSSC - 2015

Explanation

  • Using a mouth-operated suction device creates a direct mucous membrane exposure for the nurse to the infant's bodily fluids.
  • The infant's secretions can be contaminated with maternal blood, which carries a risk of HIV transmission.
  • This practice is a direct violation of Standard (Universal) Precautions, which are designed to protect healthcare workers from blood-borne pathogens.
  • Safer, recommended methods for clearing a newborn's airway include using a bulb syringe or a mechanical suction apparatus.

Why Other Options Were Wrong

  • Option B: Administering oxygen is a standard medical treatment for respiratory distress and is unrelated to HIV transmission risk. It is a necessary and safe intervention.
  • Option C: Wiping secretions from the mouth is a routine and essential part of newborn care to ensure a clear airway. It is safe as long as the nurse wears gloves.
  • Option D: Wiping the nose and eyes separately is the correct and recommended procedure. It prevents cross-contamination and potential infections, which is good nursing practice for all newborns.

Related Visual

Visual explanation — Related Visual
Clinical Relevance
  • Nursing practice connection: Knowing Infection control and safety precautions for newborns of HIV-positive mothers helps nurses interpret findings accurately and avoid errors in routine assessment, medication administration, and patient teaching.
  • This question highlights the critical importance of adhering to Standard Precautions for all patients, regardless of their known infection status, to protect both the patient and the healthcare provider.
  • Accidental exposure to potentially infectious bodily fluids is a serious occupational hazard. In case of mucous membrane exposure, the nurse must immediately follow the facility's post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) protocol, which includes reporting the incident, baseline testing, and potentially starting antiretroviral medication.
  • What if the infant required vigorous suctioning due to meconium-stained fluid? The principle remains the same: mouth suction is never appropriate. The nurse must use a mechanical suction catheter connected to a regulated suction source to safely and effectively clear the airway.
How to Approach the Question
  • First, identify the negative framing of the question: it asks for the action that is 'not recommended'.
  • Next, recall the primary mode of HIV transmission: through blood and certain bodily fluids.
  • Evaluate each option based on the principles of Standard (Universal) Precautions, which aim to prevent contact with potentially infectious materials.
  • Consider the risk each action poses to the nurse. Giving oxygen and wiping secretions (with gloves) are low-risk, standard procedures.
  • Analyze the action of mouth suctioning. This involves direct contact between the nurse's mouth and the infant's secretions, creating a clear pathway for potential infection.
  • Conclude that mouth suctioning is the most dangerous and inappropriate action, making it the correct answer to the 'not recommended' question.
Concept Tested & Keywords
  • Concept Tested: Infection control and safety precautions for newborns of HIV-positive mothers.
  • Stem keywords: newborn, HIV-positive mother, nurse's actions, caring
  • Lead-in keywords: not recommended
  • Negative lead-in flag: The question asks for an action that is NOT recommended, which is a negative framing.

Question ID

Q293izvCFHQdUo0LpirLtz

Reference Book

E6 Text Book Of Pediatric Nursing 3rd Panchali Pal — Part 2 (pp 239-476 of 713) p. 8-10

E6 Medicine Harrison 22e Part 1 p. 1606-1608

Practise the full HPSSC - 2015

Attempt every question from this paper in a timed mock, then review the full solution for each one.

More Newborn Infants Questions

More HPSSC - 2015 Questions