INI-CET EXAM -2025
Medical & Surgical Nursing
Medium

Which of the following statements about shock is accurate?

Appeared in: INI-CET EXAM -2025

Explanation

  • Hemorrhagic shock is classified into four stages based on the percentage of blood volume lost.
  • Class I involves up to 15% loss, and Class II involves 15-30% loss.
  • Severe, decompensated shock begins with Class III (30-40% loss) and progresses to Class IV (>40% loss).
  • Since Class III and IV shock are considered severe and involve blood loss greater than 20%, the statement is clinically and factually correct.

Why Other Options Were Wrong

  • Option A: Uterine inversion leads to massive hemorrhage, causing hypovolemic shock due to volume loss, not neurogenic shock which results from failed sympathetic tone.
  • Option B: The term 'endotoxic shock' specifically refers to shock caused by endotoxins (LPS) from the cell walls of Gram-negative bacteria. Gram-positive bacteria cause septic shock via other mechanisms like exotoxins.
  • Option D: This describes the hyperdynamic ('warm') phase of distributive shock (e.g., septic shock) only. It is not a characteristic of all shock types; cardiogenic and hypovolemic shock are characterized by low cardiac output.

Related Visual

Visual explanation — Related Visual
  • Visual 1: Table: Classification of Hemorrhagic Shock - A table showing the four classes of hemorrhagic shock with corresponding percentages of blood loss, heart rate, blood pressure, and clinical signs. This would visually clarify why '>20% loss' encompasses severe shock.
  • Visual 2: Flowchart: Pathophysiology of Shock Types - A flowchart illustrating the different primary mechanisms for hypovolemic, cardiogenic, distributive, and obstructive shock, highlighting the differences in cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance.
Clinical Relevance
  • Nursing practice connection: This is primarily an exam-oriented knowledge point with limited direct bedside application, so retain Pathophysiology and Classification of Shock as background academic context rather than a clinical decision trigger.
  • Recognizing the type and severity of shock is a critical nursing skill for initiating appropriate and timely interventions, such as fluid resuscitation for hypovolemia or vasopressors for distributive shock.
  • In a patient with postpartum bleeding, a nurse must immediately suspect hypovolemic shock and not be misled by other potential causes. Rapid assessment of blood loss and vital signs is paramount.
  • What if? If a patient has signs of infection (fever, high WBC) and is hypotensive but has warm extremities and a bounding pulse, the nurse should suspect early septic (distributive) shock, where cardiac output can be high, rather than hypovolemic shock.
How to Approach the Question
  • Read the question stem to understand the core topic: identifying an accurate statement about shock.
  • Evaluate each option as a standalone factual statement.
  • For Option A, recall the primary consequence of uterine inversion (hemorrhage) and link it to the correct shock type (hypovolemic).
  • For Option B, differentiate between the causes of septic shock in general and the specific definition of 'endotoxic' shock.
  • For Option C, recall the classification of hemorrhagic shock and determine if 'severe shock' can occur with a blood loss greater than 20%.
  • For Option D, consider if 'increased cardiac output' is a universal feature of all shock or specific to one type. This helps identify it as an overgeneralization.
Concept Tested & Keywords
  • Concept Tested: Pathophysiology and Classification of Shock
  • Stem keywords: shock, accurate statement
  • Lead-in keywords: Which

Question ID

QBCtM8nJqZF64gPZImW5br

Practise the full INI-CET EXAM -2025

Attempt every question from this paper in a timed mock, then review the full solution for each one.

More Shock and Multisystem Failure Questions

More INI-CET EXAM -2025 Questions