Which of the following approaches would be most appropriate to use with a client suffering from narcissistic personality disorder when discrepancies exist between what the client states and what actually exist?

Appeared in: SJH Nursing Officer - 2019

Explanation

Supportive confrontation is the most effective technique for addressing discrepancies between a client's statements and reality, particularly in Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD).
This technique involves gently pointing out inconsistencies in a non-judgmental, empathetic manner, often described as 'holding a mirror to the patient’s behavior' in a nurturant way.
It aims to help the client face reality and develop insight without triggering a 'narcissistic injury' (intense shame or rage), which would damage the therapeutic relationship.
The effectiveness of this technique is highly dependent on a strong, pre-existing therapeutic alliance between the nurse and the client.

Why Other Options Were Wrong

Option A: Rationalization is a defense mechanism used by the client to make their behavior seem logical or acceptable. It is part of the client's psychopathology, not a therapeutic intervention used by the nurse.
Option C: Limit setting is a behavioral intervention used to manage inappropriate actions, such as rule-breaking, verbal abuse, or excessive demands. It is not the primary tool for addressing a cognitive discrepancy between words and facts.
Option D: Consistency is a foundational principle of care, requiring all staff members to enforce rules and treatment plans uniformly. While essential for managing clients with personality disorders to prevent splitting, it is a general strategy, not a specific communication technique for a single interaction.

Related Visual

Clinical Relevance

Nursing practice connection: This is primarily an exam-oriented knowledge point with limited direct bedside application, so retain Therapeutic communication techniques for clients with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) as background academic context rather than a clinical decision trigger.
Using supportive confrontation correctly is a key nursing skill that builds trust and allows clients with personality disorders to develop self-awareness, which is a primary goal of therapy.
Failing to address discrepancies allows the client's distorted self-view and maladaptive patterns to persist, hindering therapeutic progress and potentially leading to conflict.
This technique helps maintain a therapeutic boundary, preventing the nurse from getting drawn into the client's reality distortion or engaging in a power struggle.

How to Approach the Question

First, identify the key elements of the question: the diagnosis is 'narcissistic personality disorder' and the specific problem is a 'discrepancy' between the client's words and reality.
Recall the core features of NPD: a grandiose self-image that is often fragile and sensitive to criticism.
The goal is to find a therapeutic approach that addresses the discrepancy without causing the client to become defensive or hostile (narcissistic injury).
Evaluate each option as a nursing intervention for this specific problem:
Rationalization: Is this something the nurse does, or the client does? It's a client defense mechanism, so eliminate it.
Supportive Confrontation: Does this address a discrepancy in a therapeutic way? Yes, the name itself implies both addressing the issue (confrontation) and maintaining the relationship (supportive).

Concept Tested & Keywords

Concept Tested: Therapeutic communication techniques for clients with Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD).
Stem keywords: narcissistic personality disorder, discrepancies, client states, actually exist
Lead-in keywords: most appropriate

Question ID

QReHtF_9Ti5jqFJTqjp2G8

Reference Book

E6 Robert Boland, Marcia L. Verduin - Kaplan and Sadock's Comprehensive Text of Psychiatry-Wolters Kluwer Health (2024) (pp 1-16525 of 16525) p. 8913-8915

E6 Kaplan Sadock's Synopsis of Psychiatry-2022 (pp 1-3768 of 3768) p. 1829-1831

Practise the full SJH Nursing Officer - 2019

Attempt every question from this paper in a timed mock, then review the full solution for each one.

Attempt this paper Attempt in the NPrep app