NORCET 10 Mains
Nursing Foundation
Easy

During IV line insertion, which site should be avoided?

Appeared in: NORCET 10 Mains

Explanation

  • An infiltrated site must be avoided for any new IV insertion.
  • Infiltration occurs when IV fluid leaks into the surrounding subcutaneous tissue, causing swelling, coolness, and pain.
  • Placing a new cannula at or near an infiltrated area is contraindicated as it can increase tissue damage, cause more pain, and lead to further complications.
  • The standard nursing intervention for infiltration is to stop the infusion, remove the catheter, and restart the IV in a new location.

Why Other Options Were Wrong

  • Option A: This describes the recommended technique for selecting IV sites, not a physical site to be avoided. It is a best practice.
  • Option C: The cubital region (antecubital fossa) is a common site for venipuncture, especially for blood draws and placing large-bore cannulas in emergencies.
  • Option D: The cephalic vein is a large, accessible, and superficial vein, making it one of the most preferred sites for peripheral IV cannulation.

Related Visual

Visual explanation — Related Visual
  • Visual 1: Image - A comparison showing a normal IV site versus a site with clear signs of infiltration (swelling, pallor, and edema).
  • Visual 2: Diagram - An illustration of the major veins of the arm (cephalic, basilic, median cubital) demonstrating the distal-to-proximal approach for IV site selection.
Clinical Relevance
  • Nursing practice connection: This is primarily an exam-oriented knowledge point with limited direct bedside application, so retain Contraindications for IV Cannulation Sites as background academic context rather than a clinical decision trigger.
  • Proper IV site selection is a fundamental nursing skill that prevents complications like infiltration, phlebitis, and nerve damage, ensuring patient safety.
  • Nurses must perform a thorough assessment of the patient's limb before every venipuncture, checking for contraindications such as a history of mastectomy, presence of an AV fistula, or signs of infection.
  • What if? If a patient requires a vesicant (a drug that can cause severe tissue damage) and the only available site is a small vein in the hand, the nurse should question the order and advocate for a central line to prevent the catastrophic complication of extravasation.
How to Approach the Question
  • First, identify the core of the question: it asks for a contraindication for IV insertion, meaning a reason not to use a site.
  • Next, evaluate each option. Differentiate between techniques, acceptable sites, and contraindicated sites.
  • Option A, 'Distal to proximal approach,' is a technique, not a site. This is the correct method, not a site to avoid.
  • Options C, 'Cubital region,' and D, 'Cephalic vein,' are names of common anatomical locations used for IV access. They are generally acceptable sites.
  • Option B, 'Infiltration at distal site,' describes a complication or an abnormal condition. Inserting an IV into a compromised area is unsafe.
  • Conclude that the presence of infiltration is the only absolute reason to avoid a site among the given choices.
Concept Tested & Keywords
  • Concept Tested: Contraindications for IV Cannulation Sites
  • Stem keywords: IV line insertion, site, avoided
  • Lead-in keywords: which
  • Negative lead-in flag: false

Question ID

QU_2BF7qR5GB2mzIgraUpS

Practise the full NORCET 10 Mains

Attempt every question from this paper in a timed mock, then review the full solution for each one.

More Fluid, electrolytes & Acid-base balances Questions

More NORCET 10 Mains Questions