A patient with an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) reports experiencing multiple shock episodes while at home. He is now in the emergency department, fully conscious, oriented, but anxious. What is the next best step?
Appeared in: AIIMS M.Sc. Nsg Entrance exam-2026
Explanation
The question asks for the 'next best step', which in an emergency setting always prioritizes assessment before intervention.
Attaching an ECG monitor and assessing vital signs are the core components of a primary survey (ABC - Circulation assessment).
This action provides the essential data needed to understand the patient's current cardiac rhythm and hemodynamic stability.
The results of the ECG and vital signs will determine if the ICD shocks were appropriate (for a life-threatening rhythm) or inappropriate (due to a non-lethal rhythm or device malfunction), which guides all further treatment.
Why Other Options Were Wrong
Option A: Multiple ICD shocks are not a 'normal occurrence'. This provides false reassurance and minimizes a potentially life-threatening situation known as an electrical storm.
Option B: Deactivating the ICD without a full assessment and a backup plan is extremely dangerous. The device is the patient's protection against fatal arrhythmias.
Option D: This addresses the patient's anxiety but completely ignores the underlying, potentially fatal cardiac cause of the shocks. Discharging the patient would be negligent.
Related Visual
Visual 1: Image - A patient in an emergency department bed connected to a cardiac monitor, showing the placement of ECG leads and a vital signs display.
Visual 2: Diagram - An illustration showing the placement of an ICD and its leads within the heart.
Visual 3: ECG Strip - An example of Ventricular Tachycardia (VT), which is a common reason for an appropriate ICD shock.
Clinical Relevance
Nursing practice connection: Prioritize focused assessment, early escalation, and real-time monitoring when managing Emergency management of a patient with an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) after receiving multiple shocks in acute care settings.
The nurse's primary role in this scenario is rapid and accurate assessment. Recognizing that multiple ICD shocks are an emergency is critical for patient safety.
Nurses must be prepared to provide immediate psychological support, as receiving shocks is a terrifying experience for patients, increasing anxiety and myocardial oxygen demand.
What if the patient was found unconscious? The 'next best step' would change to initiating the ACLS protocol: check for a pulse, and if absent, begin chest compressions and call for a defibrillator, as the patient is in cardiac arrest despite the ICD.
How to Approach the Question
First, identify the question type: This is a clinical priority question asking for the 'next best step' in an emergency.
Analyze the patient's situation: The patient has a known cardiac device (ICD) and has experienced a critical event (multiple shocks). They are currently conscious but anxious.
Apply the nursing process (ADPIE). The first and most critical step is always Assessment.
Evaluate the options based on the 'Assessment first' principle. Which option represents the most crucial assessment?
Option C (ECG and vitals) is a pure assessment step. Options A, B, and D are interventions or communications.
Eliminate the incorrect options by identifying their risks: A (false reassurance), B (dangerous intervention), D (unsafe discharge). This confirms that the assessment step (C) is the correct priority.
Concept Tested & Keywords
Concept Tested: Emergency management of a patient with an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) after receiving multiple shocks.