A nurse manager is evaluating cost-effectiveness of a tuberculosis (TB) control program. Which economic evaluation method is most appropriate?

1. A

   Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA)

2. B

   Cost-Minimization Analysis (CMA)

3. C

   Cost-Utility Analysis (CUA)

4. D

   Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA)

Appeared in: GMCH Nursing Officer-2025

Explanation

• Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) is the most suitable method for evaluating public health programs like TB control.
• CEA compares the financial costs of an intervention to its outcomes, which are measured in natural health units (e.g., number of TB cases prevented, lives saved).
• This approach avoids the ethical difficulty of placing a monetary value on human life, which is a major drawback of Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA).
• It provides a practical metric, such as 'cost per case prevented,' which helps decision-makers like nurse managers allocate resources to the most efficient programs.

Why Other Options Were Wrong

• Option A: Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) is inappropriate because it requires assigning a monetary value to health outcomes like preventing a death from TB, which is ethically challenging and often impractical.
• Option B: Cost-Minimization Analysis (CMA) is incorrect because it can only be used when the health outcomes of the compared interventions are proven to be identical. Different TB control strategies (e.g., DOTS vs. a new drug regimen) are unlikely to have the exact same effectiveness.
• Option C: Cost-Utility Analysis (CUA) is a more specialized subtype of CEA. While it could be used, standard CEA is the broader and more direct method when the primary outcome is preventing cases or deaths, as is typical for an infectious disease control program.

Related Visual

• Visual 1: Flowchart: A flowchart illustrating the decision process for choosing an economic evaluation method. It would start with 'Are outcomes identical?' If yes, use CMA. If no, 'Can outcomes be valued in money?' If yes, use CBA. If no, use CEA/CUA. This helps visualize the selection logic.
• Visual 2: Infographic: A comparative infographic showing the four methods (CBA, CEA, CUA, CMA) with icons representing their cost input (money symbol) and outcome measurement (money symbol for CBA, heart/person icon for CEA, QALY scale for CUA, and an equals sign for CMA).

Clinical Relevance

• Nursing practice connection: Knowing Economic evaluation methods in healthcare management helps nurses interpret findings accurately and avoid errors in routine assessment, medication administration, and patient teaching.
• Nurse managers play a crucial role in resource allocation. Understanding economic evaluation methods enables them to advocate for programs that provide the maximum health benefit for the community within budget constraints.
• This knowledge is essential for making evidence-based decisions, justifying budgets to hospital administration, and ensuring the financial sustainability of nursing services and public health initiatives.
• What if the question was about choosing between two brands of TB drugs that are proven to have the exact same cure rate and side effect profile? In that specific case, Cost-Minimization Analysis (CMA) would become the most appropriate method, as the goal would simply be to choose the cheaper drug.

How to Approach the Question

• First, identify the core task in the question: evaluating a 'TB control program'. This is a public health intervention.
• Next, analyze the keywords 'cost-effectiveness'. This term itself is one of the options, making it a strong candidate.
• Consider the nature of the outcome for a TB program. The goal is to prevent cases and save lives. These are 'natural health units,' not easily converted to money.
• Evaluate each option based on this understanding:
• CBA requires monetary outcomes (difficult for life/health).
• CMA requires identical outcomes (unlikely for different programs).

Concept Tested & Keywords

• Concept Tested: Economic evaluation methods in healthcare management
• Stem keywords: nurse manager, cost-effectiveness, tuberculosis (TB) control program, economic evaluation method
• Lead-in keywords: most appropriate
• Negative lead-in flag: false

Question ID

QxHtlFdU1SDctWUkEdQ8aw

Copy ID