RUHS, Jaipur, M.Sc Nursing Entrance Exam-2019
Nursing Research & Statistics
Easy

Restriction in the study that may decrease the credibility the research findings?

Appeared in: RUHS, Jaipur, M.Sc Nursing Entrance Exam-2019

Explanation

  • Limitations are weaknesses, constraints, or shortcomings in a research study that are often outside the researcher's control.
  • These factors can potentially compromise the study's credibility, validity, and the ability to generalize the findings to a larger population.
  • Acknowledging limitations is a crucial part of a research report as it demonstrates transparency and allows readers to form a more complete picture of the study.
  • Common examples include a small or non-representative sample, methodological issues like attrition, or problems with data collection instruments.

Why Other Options Were Wrong

  • Option A: Delimitations are not weaknesses. They are the boundaries intentionally set by the researcher to define the scope of the study and make it manageable.
  • Option C: A hypothesis is a predictive statement about the outcome of the study that the researcher intends to test. It is not a restriction or a flaw.
  • Option D: Assumptions are principles or statements that are accepted as true without proof. They are the foundation of the study, not inherent weaknesses that reduce credibility.

Related Visual

side chart comparing Limitations and Delimitations based on control uncontrolled vs. controlled, timing identified during/after vs. set before, and impact on the study ...
Clinical Relevance
  • Nursing practice connection: This is primarily an exam-oriented knowledge point with limited direct bedside application, so retain Differentiating between Limitations and Delimitations in Research as background academic context rather than a clinical decision trigger.
  • For evidence-based practice, nurses must critically appraise research by identifying limitations to determine the strength and applicability of the evidence.
  • Understanding a study's limitations helps prevent the inappropriate application of research findings to patient care, ensuring that clinical decisions are based on sound evidence.
  • What if a study on a new diabetes management technique shows positive results but has a limitation of a very short follow-up period? A nurse should be cautious, recognizing that the long-term benefits and potential side effects are unknown, and should not advocate for widespread changes in practice based solely on this study.
How to Approach the Question
  • First, analyze the question's keywords: "restriction," "decrease credibility." This points to a weakness or flaw in the study design or execution.
  • Next, evaluate each option's definition in the context of research methodology.
  • A 'Hypothesis' is a prediction, and 'Assumptions' are accepted truths, so they don't fit the definition of a credibility-reducing restriction.
  • Differentiate between 'Delimitations' and 'Limitations'. 'Delimitations' are intentional boundaries (choices), while 'Limitations' are unintentional weaknesses (problems).
  • Since the question asks about factors that decrease credibility, this aligns directly with the definition of 'Limitations'.
Concept Tested & Keywords
  • Concept Tested: Differentiating between Limitations and Delimitations in Research
  • Stem keywords: restriction, study, decrease credibility, research findings
  • Lead-in keywords: BEST, MOST RELEVANT CLUE
  • Negative lead-in flag: false

Question ID

QM6_QKkIbyqunMGArKUba5

Reference Book

E6 NursingResearch Sukhpal Kaur pp. 119-121, 117-119

E6 NursingResearch Suresh Sharma 5e Part 1 p. 106-108

Practise the full RUHS, Jaipur, M.Sc Nursing Entrance Exam-2019

Attempt every question from this paper in a timed mock, then review the full solution for each one.