RUHS, Jaipur, M.Sc Nursing Entrance Exam-2019
Nursing Research & Statistics
Easy

Restriction in the study that may decrease the credibility the research findings?

Appeared in: RUHS, Jaipur, M.Sc Nursing Entrance Exam-2019

Explanation

  • Limitations are weaknesses, constraints, or shortcomings in a research study that are often outside the researcher's control.
  • These factors can potentially compromise the study's credibility, validity, and the ability to generalize the findings to a larger population.
  • Acknowledging limitations is a crucial part of a research report as it demonstrates transparency and allows readers to form a more complete picture of the study.
  • Common examples include a small or non-representative sample, methodological issues like attrition, or problems with data collection instruments.

Why Other Options Were Wrong

  • Option A: Delimitations are not weaknesses. They are the boundaries intentionally set by the researcher to define the scope of the study and make it manageable.
  • Option C: A hypothesis is a predictive statement about the outcome of the study that the researcher intends to test. It is not a restriction or a flaw.
  • Option D: Assumptions are principles or statements that are accepted as true without proof. They are the foundation of the study, not inherent weaknesses that reduce credibility.

Related Visual

Visual explanation — Related Visual
Clinical Relevance
  • Nursing practice connection: This is primarily an exam-oriented knowledge point with limited direct bedside application, so retain Differentiating between Limitations and Delimitations in Research as background academic context rather than a clinical decision trigger.
  • For evidence-based practice, nurses must critically appraise research by identifying limitations to determine the strength and applicability of the evidence.
  • Understanding a study's limitations helps prevent the inappropriate application of research findings to patient care, ensuring that clinical decisions are based on sound evidence.
  • What if a study on a new diabetes management technique shows positive results but has a limitation of a very short follow-up period? A nurse should be cautious, recognizing that the long-term benefits and potential side effects are unknown, and should not advocate for widespread changes in practice based solely on this study.
How to Approach the Question
  • First, analyze the question's keywords: "restriction," "decrease credibility." This points to a weakness or flaw in the study design or execution.
  • Next, evaluate each option's definition in the context of research methodology.
  • A 'Hypothesis' is a prediction, and 'Assumptions' are accepted truths, so they don't fit the definition of a credibility-reducing restriction.
  • Differentiate between 'Delimitations' and 'Limitations'. 'Delimitations' are intentional boundaries (choices), while 'Limitations' are unintentional weaknesses (problems).
  • Since the question asks about factors that decrease credibility, this aligns directly with the definition of 'Limitations'.
Concept Tested & Keywords
  • Concept Tested: Differentiating between Limitations and Delimitations in Research
  • Stem keywords: restriction, study, decrease credibility, research findings
  • Lead-in keywords: BEST, MOST RELEVANT CLUE
  • Negative lead-in flag: false

Question ID

QM6_QKkIbyqunMGArKUba5

Reference Book

E6 NursingResearch Sukhpal Kaur pp. 119-121, 117-119

E6 NursingResearch Suresh Sharma 5e Part 1 p. 106-108

Practise the full RUHS, Jaipur, M.Sc Nursing Entrance Exam-2019

Attempt every question from this paper in a timed mock, then review the full solution for each one.