AIIMS Bhopal NO - 2018 (Shift-1st)
Nursing Management & leadership
Easy

During a performance appraisal, if the head nurse commits an error, it is called?

Appeared in: AIIMS Bhopal NO - 2018 (Shift-1st)

Explanation

  • The Horns effect is a cognitive bias where an appraiser focuses on a single negative attribute or incident, allowing it to color the entire performance evaluation negatively.
  • In the context of the question, if an appraiser fixates on one error made by the head nurse, it can lead to an unfairly low rating across all performance criteria.
  • This bias prevents an objective and comprehensive assessment of the employee's actual performance over the evaluation period.
  • The term 'Horns' is used metaphorically to suggest that a single negative point gives the employee 'horns' in the eyes of the evaluator.

Why Other Options Were Wrong

  • Option A: Paired comparison is a method or technique for conducting performance appraisals, not a type of error or bias made by the appraiser.
  • Option C: Central tendency error involves rating all employees as 'average' to avoid making difficult judgments or differentiating between high and low performers. It does not involve focusing on a specific negative trait.
  • Option D: The Halo effect is the opposite of the Horns effect. It involves letting one positive trait lead to an overly positive overall evaluation.

Related Visual

Visual explanation — Related Visual
Clinical Relevance
  • Nursing practice connection: Knowing Performance Appraisal Biases helps nurses interpret findings accurately and avoid errors in routine assessment, medication administration, and patient teaching.
  • Fair and objective performance appraisals are crucial for maintaining staff morale, promoting professional growth, and ensuring high-quality patient care.
  • Nurse managers must be trained to recognize and avoid common appraisal biases like the Horns and Halo effects to provide constructive feedback and make fair decisions about promotions and assignments.
  • Unfair appraisals can lead to decreased motivation, increased staff turnover, and a negative work environment, which can ultimately impact patient safety and outcomes.
How to Approach the Question
  • First, identify the core concept of the question, which is about an 'error' in 'performance appraisal'.
  • Analyze the scenario: a 'head nurse commits an error', and this single event influences the appraisal. The key is the focus on one negative event.
  • Recall the definitions of common performance appraisal biases and methods provided in the options.
  • Differentiate between appraisal methods (like Paired comparison) and appraisal errors/biases (like Horns, Halo, and Central tendency).
  • Match the scenario (one negative event skewing the entire review) with its correct definition, which is the Horns effect.
Concept Tested & Keywords
  • Concept Tested: Performance Appraisal Biases
  • Stem keywords: performance appraisal, head nurse, error
  • Lead-in keywords: it is called
  • Negative lead-in flag: false

Question ID

QSWyAZSRSR-rRbMgQ60leL

Reference Book

E6 Nursing_Management_and_leadership_Johny_Kutty_JosephCbs_Publishers (pp 16-364 of 374) p. 191-193

Practise the full AIIMS Bhopal NO - 2018 (Shift-1st)

Attempt every question from this paper in a timed mock, then review the full solution for each one.

More Management of Nursing Educational Institute Questions

More AIIMS Bhopal NO - 2018 (Shift-1st) Questions